Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 90-B, Issue SUPP_III, 441.  
Copyright © 2008 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Rhijn Lodewijk, W.
Right arrow Articles by van Ooij, A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van Rhijn Lodewijk, W.
Right arrow Articles by van Ooij, A.

11th Philip Zorab Symposium


Oxford, England: 3–5 April 2006

Chairman: Mr Michael Edgar


MINIMALLY INVASIVE ANTERIOR APPROACH OF THE THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FOR THE CORRECTION OF SCOLIOSIS

W. van Rhijn Lodewijk; G.C. Huitema; and A. van Ooij

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands. Fax: +31 43 3874893, E-mail: lvr{at}sort.azm.nl

Study design: Prospective study after minimally invasive anterior approach of the thoracolumbar spine in scoliosis correction.

Objective: To describe the technique and first results after minimally invasive anterior approach of the thoracolumbar junction with insertion of double rod and double screw instrumentation.

Summary of Background Data: Minimally invasive techniques are used at many areas of surgery nowadays. Minimally invasive surgery should have the same correction potential as with conventional approaches. Possible advantages of minimally invasive surgery are small incisions, less tissue damage, less morbidity and an improved cosmetic appearance.

Methods: In this study we describe the technique and the preliminary results of minimally invasive open approach of the thoracolumbar spine with insertion of double rod and double screw instrumentation. A consecutive series of seven patients were included. All patients were female with a mean age of 16.7 years (range 10–28). The cause of thoracolumbar scoliosis was mixed.

Results: The thoracolumbar curve was 59° preoperatively and 22° at six months follow up (63% correction). The unfused thoracic curve was 40° preoperatively and 29° at six months follow-up. In the sagittal plane of the fused levels Cobb angle was 61° of lordosis preoperatively and 35° of lordosis at six months follow up. Lumbar lordosis of the unfused spine was 16° preoperative and 5° at six months follow up. Thoracic kyphosis was 33° preoperatively and 24° at six months follow-up. The average time of surgery was 6.6 hours (range 5.5–7hours). The average estimated blood loss was 764ml (range 350–1200ml). Average hospital stay was 11 days (range 5–14days), and average stay at the intensive care unit was 1.7 days (range 0–3 days). One minor neurological complication with complete recovery was observed.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery has the advantage of less tissue damage, less morbidity and a better cosmetic appearance. With newer implants a good correction of the scoliosis can be achieved.

Correspondence should be addressed to Jeremy C T Fairbank at The Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford OX7 7LD, UK






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General