Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 90-B, Issue SUPP_III, 447.  
Copyright © 2008 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aarvold, A
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, J
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Aarvold, A
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, J

Britspine


Cardiff, Wales: 26 April 2006

Chairman: Mr Paul Rhys Davies


HYPOGLOSSAL CANAL ANATOMY – RELEVANCE TO SAFE SCREW PASSAGE FOR C1-OCCIPUT STABILISATION

AarvoldA ; CaseyA *; and BernardJ

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St George’s Hospital Medical School, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London SW17 0QT; Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore

Introduction: Atlanto-Occipital dislocation is rare and usually fatal. Stabilisation is typically from Occiput to C2; sacrificing atlantoaxial movement. To preserve movement, screw fixation from the articular mass of C1 to the occipital condyle has been described. Amongst other structures, the hypoglossal nerve is at risk. No previous study has addressed the anatomy of the hypoglossal canal in relation to screw trajectory. We aim to identify landmarks to aid safe screw passage into the occipital condyle.

Methods: 20 dry skulls provided 40 hypoglossal canals (HCs) and 40 occipital condyles (OCs). No distinction was made between sex, race or age. 9 parameters were measured for each HC, and relation to skull base was noted.

Results: The mean length of the HC was 10mm (range 8 to 14). The extra-cranial foramen of the HC is located lateral to the intra-cranial foramen (30° range 19 to 45). 19 out of 20 skulls had HCs with intra-cranial foramina more caudal than their extra-cranial foramina, ie the HC angled cranially (22° range 7 to 51). 36 of 40 OCs were found to be wholly inferior to the rim of the foramen magnum, with 4 (in 2 skulls) whose bodies lay largely below, but extended above, this landmark. Every single HC studied was situated, in its entirety, superior to the rim of the foramen magnum.

Conclusions: The trajectory of the hypoglossal canal from its intra-cranial foramen is antero-supero-lateral. It is situated, in its entirety, superior to the rim of the foramen magnum. The thickest portion of the occipital condyle is antero-medial. Screw passage from posterior through the C1 articular mass ought to aim for the anterior, superior, medial quadrant of the occipital condyle, and should not pass cranial to the rim of the Foramen Magnum in order to minimise the risk to the Hypoglossal Nerve.

Correspondence should be addressed to: Sue Woodward, Secreteriat, Britspine, Vale Clinic, Hensol Park, Vale of Glamorgan, CF72 8JY Wales.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General