Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 90-B, Issue SUPP_III, 448.  
Copyright © 2008 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Crockard, A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Singh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Crockard, A.

Britspine


Cardiff, Wales: 26 April 2006

Chairman: Mr Paul Rhys Davies


QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT USING SHORT FORM-12 (SF12) AND SF36 QUESTIONNAIRES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY

Anoushka Singh; Kanna Gnanalingham; Adrian Casey; Wim Bouwknegt; and Alan Crockard

Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery Hospital, Queen Square, London, UK.

Introduction: There is growing interest in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) questionnaires to quantitate the impact of a variety of diseases and their treatments. The Short Form-36 (SF3) is a comprehensive measure of health status, consisting of 36 questions related to Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS).1 An abbreviated version of SF36, the SF12 has been described.2 We report on the use of SF12 and SF36 to assess the impact of surgery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

Methods: In this prospective study, patients undergoing anterior or posterior decompressive surgery self completed the SF36 questionnaire pre-operatively and at 6 months post-operatively. The data from the SF36 is categorised into 8 scales: physical functioning (PF), physical role (PR), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), emotional role (ER) and mental health (MH).1 Each scale is scored on a 0 (maximum disability) to 100 (no disability) metric. These 8 scales are reduced to a Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS).1 SF12 utilises only 12 questions of the 8 scales of the SF36.2 We compared the validity, reliability and sensitivity to change in CSM patients.

Results: We studied 105 patients with a median age of 58. Post-operatively, there were improvements in the PCS components of both the SF36 (40 ± 2 to 54 ± 2) and SF12 (34 ± 2 to 48 ± 3) (p<0.0001; Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test) and MCS component of SF36 (48 ± 2 to 63 ± 2) and SF12 (43 ± 2 to 59 ± 2) (p<0.001). There were linear relationships between the SF36 and SF12.

Conclusions: Both the SF12 and SF36 scales are valid and sensitive to changes in CSM patients, undergoing decompressive surgery. Despite its abbreviated nature, SF12 appears to be an adequate substitute for SF36 and its brevity should increase its attractiveness to both the clinicians and patients.

Correspondence should be addressed to: Sue Woodward, Secreteriat, Britspine, Vale Clinic, Hensol Park, Vale of Glamorgan, CF72 8JY Wales.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General