Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue SUPP_II, 205-206.  
Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ansara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Geeranavar, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ansara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Geeranavar, S.

British Orthopaedic Specialists Association


London, England: 25 April 2007

President: Mr A Choudhary


ARTHROSCOPIC SHOULDER CAPSULAR RELEASE FOR FROZEN SHOULDER. IS IT EFFECTIVE?

Sameh Ansara; Sab. Chokkalingam; and S. Geeranavar

Sandwell General Hospital UK

Introduction: Idiopathic Adhesive capsulitis [IAC] of the shoulder is a self limited condition that can cause significant morbidity. Most patients (90%) respond to conservative management and those who fails (10%) undergo manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) Patients who are refractory to both treatments, benefits from arthroscopic capsular release.

Aim: To assess the efficacy of arthroscopic capsular release in patients with IAC refractory to physiotherapy and MUA. Also to compare the clinical outcome between arthroscopic capsular release and MUA.

Materials and methods: We studied 59 patients with IAC, divided into 2 groups. Group A [36patients] had MUA and Group B [23 patients] underwent arthroscopic capsular release. The mean age was (54years).

The mean follow up was 21 and 9 months for group A and B respectively.

Results: We assessed our results according to three parameters:

  1. Final outcome using the Constant and Murley score. The improvement in the score averaged 42 and 47 points in group A and B respectively
  2. Early Post operative pain using visual analogue score (VAS) average of 6 and 3 in group A and B respectively
  3. Overall patient satisfaction: 81% in group A and 89% in group B.

Conclusion:

  • Patients with IAC who fails to respond physiotherapy and MUA do well after arthroscopic capsular release with little operative morbidity.
  • Complete normal functional outcome of shoulder is not a prerequisite for patient satisfaction.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Bimal Singh, c/o BOSA at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General