Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue SUPP_II, 210.  
Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, D.
Right arrow Articles by Stapley, S.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, D.
Right arrow Articles by Stapley, S.A.

Combined Services Orthopaedic Society


Bovington, England: 18 May 2007

President: Mr R Vickers


PENETRATION OF THE WARRIOR ARMOURED PERSONNEL CARRIER (APC) BY SHAPED CHARGE IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES (IED) – EMERGING INJURY PATTERNS

D. Edwards; C. Lane; G. Pathak; and S.A. Stapley

For 20 years the Warrior APC has been the workhorse of the British Army Infantry. Attacks have been focused on the weak point between the body and the turret resulting in injury to the commander, gunner and driver, but not the passengers. From December 2006 to February 2007 there were 3 IED incidents involving the Warrior APC in which the main armour and the body was breached. This resulted in significant injury patterns and casualty numbers.

Cases:

  1. In late December 6 casualties were admitted to the Field Hospital (6xT3), all suffering from thermal and/or fragmentation injures.
  2. In mid-January, 4 casualties were admitted (1xT0, 1xT1, 1xT2, 1xT3). Injuries sustained included traumatic amputation of the lower limb, thermal, and lower limb fragmentation injuries.
  3. In early February 6 casualties were seen in the Field Hospital (1xT0, 2xT1, 1xT2, 2xT3). Again injuries sustained included traumatic amputation of lower and upper limbs, thermal and fragmentation and blast injury.

In each case the IED was deployed at distances of approximately 30ft and consisted of a homemade shaped-charge of approximately 32kg. Its detonation was via a short command wire and fired at an angle of 0–45°. Three injury patterns emerged – 1) Thermal, 2) Blast and 3) Ballistic – with worsening severity if suffering from one, two or all three types. The average number of casualties per incident was 5.3, higher than seen in data collected in 2006 (2.3, Ramasamay et al).

The use of improvised shaped-charges has resulted in significant injuries to the passengers of the Warrior APC. These have been a combination of thermal, ballistic and blast, often resulting in traumatic amputation. Due to the confined space of the APC an increase in casualties per incident has been observed and subsequent increase demand on medical resources.

Correspondence should be addressed to Major M Butler RAMC, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon.

Correspondence should be addressed to Major M Butler, CSOS, Institute of Naval Medicine, Crescent Road, Alverstoke, Hants PO12 2D






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General