Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue SUPP_II, 211-212.  
Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hinsley, D.E.
Right arrow Articles by Giele, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hinsley, D.E.
Right arrow Articles by Giele, H.

Combined Services Orthopaedic Society


Bovington, England: 18 May 2007

President: Mr R Vickers


THE "FLIPPED FIBULAR GRAFT" ANKLE RECONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING WIDE LOCAL EXCISION OF DISTAL FIBULA LESIONS

D.E. Hinsley; W.F.M. Jackson; H.C.L Oag; T.N. Theologis; C.L.M.H. Gibbons; and H. Giele

Young active patients with malignant tumours arising in the distal fibula, requiring excision, present a challenge to the treating surgeon. Wide local excision is advocated, to achieve clearance, however, disruption of the ankle mortise results and fusion is often required to restore stability. The loss of movement is poorly tolerated in the younger patient and leads to progressive degenerative changes in surrounding joints.

Excision of the distal fibula lesion followed by harvesting of the proximal fibula and using this graft to recreate the ankle mortise restores ankle stability and retains ankle movement.

Between 1998 and 2007, we have performed this technique on 4 patients. Diagnoses were Ewing’s sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, parosteal osteosarcoma and osteofibrous dysplasia. To date there has been no evidence of distant or local recurrence. One case was complicated by infection, which resolved with radical debridement and antibiotics; the other three fibula grafts survived. Good to excellent results were achieved.

We will present the technical aspects of this procedure, with particular reference to the most recent case, performed on a young female patient with parosteal osteosarcoma.

We believe this technique provides good oncological and functional results and recommend this treatment option is considered in young active patients requiring distal fibula excisions for sarcoma.

Correspondence should be addressed to Major M Butler RAMC, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon.

Correspondence should be addressed to Major M Butler, CSOS, Institute of Naval Medicine, Crescent Road, Alverstoke, Hants PO12 2D






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General