Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue SUPP_III, 392.  
Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sariali, E.
Right arrow Articles by Catonné, Y.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sariali, E.
Right arrow Articles by Catonné, Y.

British Society For Computer Aided Orthopaedic Surgery


Glasgow, Scotland: 7–9 February 2008

President: Mr M Maheson


ACCURACY OF ANATOMICAL HIP RECONSTRUCTION USING COMPUTERISED THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRE-OPERATIVE PLANNING AND A CEMENTLESS MODULAR-NECK PROSTHESIS

E. Sariali; A. Mouttet; G. Pasquier; and Y. Catonné

Institution: Hopital La Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France

The use of two-dimensional plain X-rays for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty is unreliable. For example, in the presence of rotational hip contracture the lateral femoral off set can be significantly under-estimated. Pre-operative planning is of particular importance when using uncemented prostheses. The aim of this study was to determine the precision of a novel 3D CT-based preoperative planning methodology with the use of a cementless modular-neck femoral stem.

Pre-operative computerised 3D planning was performed using HIP-PLAN® software for 223 patients undergoing THA with a cement-less cup and cement-less modular-neck stem. Components were chosen that best restored leg length and lateral off set. Postoperative anatomy was assessed by CT-scan and compared to the pre-operative plan.

The implanted component was the same as the planned one in 86% of cases for the cup and 94% for the stem. There was no significant difference between the mean planned femoral anteversion (26.1° +/– 11.8) and the mean postoperative anteversion (26.9° +/– 14.1) (p=0.18), with good correlation between the two (coefficient 0.8). There was poor correlation, however, between the planned values and the actual post-operative values of acetabular cup anteversion (coefficient 0.17). The rotational centre of the hip was restored with a precision of 0.73mm +/3.5 horizontally and 1.2mm +/– 2 laterally. Limb length was restored with a precision of 0.3mm +/– 3.3 and femoral off set with a precision of 0.8mm +/– 3.1. There was no significant alteration in femoral off set (0.07mm, p=0.4) which was restored in 98% of cases. Almost all of the operative difficulties encountered were predicted pre-operatively.

The precision of the three-dimensional pre-operative planning methodology investigated in this study is higher than that reported in the literature using two-dimensional X-ray templating. Cup navigation may be a useful adjunct to increase the accuracy of cup positioning.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr K Deep, General Secretary CAOS UK, Dept of Orthopaedics, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow G81 4HX, Scotland. Email: caosuk{at}gmail.com






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General