This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Longstaff, L.M. Articles by Beaver, R.J. PubMed Articles by Longstaff, L.M. Articles by Beaver, R.J.

FEMORAL COMPONENT ROTATION IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: WHICH AXIS IS BEST?

Joint Replacement Assessment Clinic and Elective Orthopaedic Department, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia.

Femoral component malrotation is a major cause of patello-femoral complications in total knee arthroplasty. In addition, it can affect varus/valgus stability during flexion which can lead to increased tibiofemoral wear.

Debate exists on where exactly to rotate the femoral component. The three principal methods utilise different anatomical landmarks: the posterior condylar axis, the transepicondylar axis and the antero-posterior axis (Whiteside’s line).

A prospective randomised controlled trial was undertaken. Sixty consecutive patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon (LML) at the Royal Perth Hospital were randomised into 3 groups based on the intra-operative method for measuring femoral rotation using the PFC sigma prosthesis (Depuy) with computer navigation (Depuy/Brainlab). All patients received the usual post-operative treatment, rehabilitation and JRAC (Joint Replacement Assessment Clinic) follow up. All underwent a CT scan according to the Perth CT protocol designed specifically to accurately measure component alignment and rotation.

No significant difference in femoral rotation was found between the three groups using a one-way analysis of variance (p=0.67). However, Whiteside’s line had a significantly greater variability than the posterior condylar or transepicondylar axis using the F Test for variances (p=0.02, p=0.03). In conclusion, whilst there was no significant difference in femoral rotation, Whiteside’s line did show greater variability (–6° to 3°), and therefore we recommend the use of either the transepicondylar or posterior condylar axis in Total Knee Replacement.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr K Deep, General Secretary CAOS UK, Dept of Orthopaedics, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow G81 4HX, Scotland. Email: caosuk{at}gmail.com