Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue SUPP_III, 394.  
Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, R.
Right arrow Articles by Blunn, G.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Russell, R.
Right arrow Articles by Blunn, G.

British Society For Computer Aided Orthopaedic Surgery

Glasgow, Scotland: 7–9 February 2008

President: Mr M Maheson

A COMPUTERISED MODEL TO STUDY BONE STRESSES IN A SCARF OSTEOTOMY

R. Russell; S. Kendall; D. Singh; S. Ahir; and G. Blunn

26 Marlin Close, Benfleet, Essex, UK SS7 2TW

Scarf osteotomy is widely used as a surgical treatment for hallux valgus. It is a versatile osteotomy, allowing shortening, depression or medial displacement of the capital fragment but it remains uncertain how stresses within the bone subsequently vary. The aim of this study was to design a computerised model to explore the effect on bone stress of changing the position of bony cuts for a scarf osteotomy.

A computerised image was constructed using finite element analysis. This utilises a mathematical technique to form element equations which represent the effect of applied force to the object appropriate to each finite element. Maximum bone stresses were then measured using different osteotomy variables. The osteotomy variables studied were the length of the longditudinal cut, apex of the distal cut to articular cartilage, resection level of the longditudinal cut and combinations of these variables. A saw bone model was used to test the findings of the study.

The results of this study show that lowering the longditudinal resection level and shortening via the distal cut beyond 6 mm will decrease bone stress. Additionally, raising the longditudinal resection level and shortening via the proximal cut caused an increase in bone stress. A saw bone model confirmed the findings of the study.

In conclusion, our experience is that finite element analysis is a very useful model in studying the bony stresses for a scarf osteotomy and assists in optimising the direction and angle of bony cuts used.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr K Deep, General Secretary CAOS UK, Dept of Orthopaedics, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow G81 4HX, Scotland. Email: caosuk{at}gmail.com






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General