This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Seon, J.K. Articles by Yoon, T.R. PubMed Articles by Seon, J.K. Articles by Yoon, T.R.

LIMB ALIGNMENT AND POSITION OF THE COMPONENTS IN BILATERAL TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT WITH ROBOTIC AND CONVENTIONALLY MANUAL SUPPORT (A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY)

Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeonnam, Korea

Bilateral sequential total knee replacement with a Zimmer NexGen prosthesis (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) was carried out in 30 patients. One knee was replaced using a robotic-assisted implantation (ROBOT side) and the other conventionally manual implantation (CON side). There were 30 women with a mean age of 67.8 years (50 to 80).

Pre-operative and post-operative scores were obtained for all patients using the Knee Society (KSS) and The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) systems. Full-length standing anteroposterior radiographs, including the femoral head and ankle, and lateral and skyline patellar views were taken pre- and post-operatively and were assessed for the mechanical axis and the position of the components. The mean follow-up was 2.3 years (2 to 3).

The operating and tourniquet times were longer in the ROBOT side (p < 0.001). There were no significant pre- or post-operative differences between the knee scores of the two groups (p = 0.288 and p = 0.429, respectively). Mean mechanical axes were not significantly different in the two groups (p = 0.815). However, there were more outliers in the CON side (8) than in the ROBOT side (1) (p = 0.013). In the coronal alignment of the femoral component, the CON side (8) had more outliers than the ROBOT side (1) (p = 0.013) and the CON side (3) also had more outliers than the ROBOT side (0) in the sagittal alignment of the femoral component (p = 0.043). In terms of outliers for coronal and sagittal tibial alignment, the CON side (1 and 4) had more outliers than the ROBOT side (0 and 2).

In this series robotic-assisted total knee replacement resulted in more accurate orientation and alignment of the components than that achieved by conventional total knee replacement.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr K Deep, General Secretary CAOS UK, Dept of Orthopaedics, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow G81 4HX, Scotland. Email: caosuk{at}gmail.com