Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue SUPP_III, 395.  
Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, S.G.
Right arrow Articles by Yoon, T.R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cho, S.G.
Right arrow Articles by Yoon, T.R.

British Society For Computer Aided Orthopaedic Surgery


Glasgow, Scotland: 7–9 February 2008

President: Mr M Maheson


SAGITTAL PLANE ALIGNMENT OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT IN TKA CAOS VS MANUAL

S.G. Cho; E.K. Song; J.K. Seon; S.J. Park; S.B. Cho; and T.R. Yoon

Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeonnam, Korea

Unexpected findings were sometimes observed such as hyper extension, oversize of femoral component, or anterior notching of anterior femoral cortex in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using computer system. We conducted this study to evaluate these findings by a virtual simulation using ORTHODOC and then confirmed them on real patients with TKA.

Virtual simulations of distal femoral cut in 50 patients using ORTHODOC system were made by way of being perpendicular to mechanical axis (CAOS way) and to intramedullary guide (manual way) in the same knee and measured the difference of sagittal cutting planes. We compared the maximum AP dimensions of femoral condyle parallel to distal cut plane. We also compared sagittal alignment and size of the femoral component in 30 bilateral TKAs, one side using ROBODOC (CAOS way) and the other side using IM guide (manual way).

On virtual simulation, distal femoral cut was more extended (3.1±1.6°) in CAOS than in manual way and anteroposterior size of the femoral condyle in CAOS way was also larger than in manual way (p=0.001). Radiographic sagittal alignment of femoral component performed using CAOS way was slightly more extended than those using manual way, showing a significant difference (p=0.024). The larger femoral components were required in six patients on CAOS and in two patients on manual way, whereas twenty-two patients showed same size on both side.

CAOS can provide more accurate sagittal cut perpendicular to mechanical axis than manual system, which may lead to slightly extended position or larger femoral component.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr K Deep, General Secretary CAOS UK, Dept of Orthopaedics, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow G81 4HX, Scotland. Email: caosuk{at}gmail.com






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General