This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Yoon, T.R. Articles by Cho, S.B. PubMed Articles by Yoon, T.R. Articles by Cho, S.B.

CLINICAL APPLICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATION IN TKR

Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeonnam, Korea

Computer based navigation system improved the accuracy of limb and component alignment and decreased the incidence of outliers. The majority of previous studies were based on the infrared navigation system. We evaluate the availability and accuracy of the electromagnectic(EM) navigation system in total knee arthroplasty

From July 2006 to January 2007, 40 patients (50 TKAs) with osteoarthritis were participated in this study. AxiEM(Medtronics) was used and Nexgen CR(26 cases), and Nexgen CR flex(24 cases) were used. We analyzed the failure mode of navigation (7 cases), operation time and radiologic results (limb and component alignment)

Total registration time was 4 minutes 45 seconds in average (Range : 3 minutes 45 seconds ~ 6 minutes 55 seconds). Failures in clinical applications resulted from non-recognition of EM tracker or paddle by metallic interference in 4 cases and from informational changes during surgery by fixation loss or loosening of the tracker in 3 cases. Radiologically, the mechanical axis changed from –11.2±7.21 (Range : –25.8~3.1) to 1.0±1.25(Range : –2.1~4.0) and 1 case of outlier occurred (valgus 4°). Component alignment is measured as followed: 89.3±1.6° of Theta angle, 89.9±1.5° of Beta angle, 1.8±2.5° of Gamma angle, 86.1±2.9 of Delta angle°. There were no complications related to the EM navigation.

The EM navigation system helped to achieve accurate alignment of component and lower leg axis without any complications. It had several advantages such as relatively less invasiveness in fitting small instruments, not disturbing operation field, no interrupted line of sight, portable use, and applicability to any implant. However, metallic interference may be still problematic.

The EM navigation had advantages; less invasiveness, no disturbing operation field, no interrupted line of sight, portable use and applicability to any implants. But metallic interference may be still problematic.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr K Deep, General Secretary CAOS UK, Dept of Orthopaedics, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow G81 4HX, Scotland. Email: caosuk{at}gmail.com