Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue SUPP_III, 399.  
Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, H.
Right arrow Articles by Cobb, J.P.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, H.
Right arrow Articles by Cobb, J.P.

British Society For Computer Aided Orthopaedic Surgery

Glasgow, Scotland: 7–9 February 2008

President: Mr M Maheson

AN ANATOMIC TIBIAL AXIS FOR ROTATIONAL ALIGNMENT IN KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

H. Dixon; W. Dandachli; F. Iranpour; V. Kannan; and J.P. Cobb

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Imperial College London, London W6 8RF

The rotational alignment of the tibia is an as yet unresolved issue for arthroplasty surgeons. Functional variation may be due to minor malrotation of the tibial component. The aim was to find a reliable method for positioning the tibial component in arthroplasty.

CT scans of 21 knees were reconstructed in three dimensions and oriented vertically. A plane was taken 20 mm below the tibial spines. The centre of each tibial condyle was calculated from points taken round that condylar cortex. A tibial tubercle centre was also generated as the centre of the circle that best fit points on the surface of the tubercle in the plane of its most prominent point.

The derived points were identified by three observers with errors of 0.6 – 1mm. The medial and lateral tibial centres were constant features (radius 24mm ± 3mm, and 22mm ± 3mm respectively). An ‘anatomic’ axis was created perpendicular to a line joining these two points. The tubercle centre was found 20mm ± 7mm lateral to the medial tibial centre. Compared to this axis, an axis perpendicular to the posterior condylar axis was internally rotated by 6° ± 3°. An axis based on the tibial tubercle and the tibial spines was also internally rotated by 6° ± 10°.

We conclude that alignment of the knee when based on this ‘anatomic’ axis is more reliable than either of the posterior surfaces. It is also more reliable than any axis involving the tubercle, which is the least reliable feature in the region. The ‘anatomic’ axis can be used in navigated knee arthroplasty for referencing the rotational alignment of the tibial component.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr K Deep, General Secretary CAOS UK, Dept of Orthopaedics, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow G81 4HX, Scotland. Email: caosuk{at}gmail.com






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General