Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue SUPP_III, 402-403.  
Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mockford, B J
Right arrow Articles by Stockley, I
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mockford, B J
Right arrow Articles by Stockley, I

British Hip Society


Norwich, England: 28–29 February 2008

President: Mr Keith Tucker


THE OUTCOME OF FAILED TWO-STAGE EXCHANGE REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY FOR INFECTION.

B J Mockford; and I Stockley

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU

Introduction: There are few published reports outlining the outcome of those patients who have undergone revision hip arthroplasty surgery for recurrent infection.

From a consecutive series of 114 patients who had undergone a two-stage exchange without prolonged antibiotic therapy we report the outcome of those patients who continued to have persistent infection.

Methods: Fourteen patients were identified, all with microbiologically proven recurrent deep infection. Seven patients have undertaken further attempts at cure by a two-stage exchange and where again a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy was not routinely used. Infection was eradicated in six out of the seven patients (84%). The mean follow-up of this group is 90 months (range 25–150 months).

Results: From the initial series an overall cure rate of 93% was seen. The other patient has a pseudarthrosis.

Seven patients elected not to undergo a further two-stage revision. Five patients have retained their arthroplasty with lifelong suppressive antibiotic therapy. One has a pseudarthrosis and one disarticulation has taken place for inadequate tissue cover.

Discussion: This series would suggest that in patients willing to undertake further surgery in an attempt to eradicate infection they stand a good chance of a successful outcome.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Peter Howard, Editorial Secretary, BHS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General