|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 91-B, Issue SUPP_III,
402-403.
Copyright © 2009 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
Norwich, England: 28–29 February 2008 President: Mr Keith Tucker
THE OUTCOME OF FAILED TWO-STAGE EXCHANGE REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY FOR INFECTION.B J Mockford; and I StockleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU
Introduction: There are few published reports outlining the outcome of those patients who have undergone revision hip arthroplasty surgery for recurrent infection. From a consecutive series of 114 patients who had undergone a two-stage exchange without prolonged antibiotic therapy we report the outcome of those patients who continued to have persistent infection. Methods: Fourteen patients were identified, all with microbiologically proven recurrent deep infection. Seven patients have undertaken further attempts at cure by a two-stage exchange and where again a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy was not routinely used. Infection was eradicated in six out of the seven patients (84%). The mean follow-up of this group is 90 months (range 25–150 months). Results: From the initial series an overall cure rate of 93% was seen. The other patient has a pseudarthrosis. Seven patients elected not to undergo a further two-stage revision. Five patients have retained their arthroplasty with lifelong suppressive antibiotic therapy. One has a pseudarthrosis and one disarticulation has taken place for inadequate tissue cover. Discussion: This series would suggest that in patients willing to undertake further surgery in an attempt to eradicate infection they stand a good chance of a successful outcome.
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Peter Howard, Editorial Secretary, BHS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincolns Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England.
|
|


